보호한답시고 넓은 땅에서 잘살던애들 케이지에 쑤셔박음...

 

고양이들은 증거물로 각각의 케이지에 박혀 임시보관소에 보관되었음

여기서 희대의 병크가 터지는데

 

고양이주인과 동물단체간의 법정싸움이 시작되기도전에

플로리다에 폭염이 발생, 임시보관소에 있던 고양이들이 탈수와 더위로 무더기로 죽어나갔음

이거 해결한다고 분양보냈는데 이미 성체인 파양묘는 분양이 매우힘듬 100여마리만 분양됨

관리 치료가 힘들다고 판된된 고양이들은 전부 안락사시킴

 

결국

수년간의 법정싸움끝에 고양이 낙원의 주인은 무죄 판정을 받았지만 

돌아온건 5마리의 고양이뿐이었음 

 

오열하는 모습 ...

 

나중에 밝혀지는 진실은

플로리다에서 보호소의 안락사를 전면적으로 금지하고 안락사없는 no-kill 보호소만 운영가능하게하는 법을 준비중이었는데

반대하는놈들이 정치적인 수단으로 하여 고양이 낙원을 이용한것이었음  

 

The political reasons for the raid

 

In 2011 and 2012, some Florida legislators wanted to pass a law making it illegal for shelters to kill an animal when a qualified non-profit no-kill rescue organization was willing to save that animal. Some people didn’t want that law, known as the Florida Animal Rescue Act. No-kill shelters might end up as hoarders by taking in more animals than they could handle. It could happen. It might be kinder to the animals if they died before they could suffer the abuse of over-crowding. May I see a show of paws?

 

Can you guess which famous animal welfare organization prefers to kill the animals in its shelter rather than adopt them out? Any ideas on which organization believes no one should have a companion pet? Or which would rather people go naked than wear fur?

 

So the organizations that opposed that bill thought about how that proposed law could be stopped. What if someone made an incriminating, misleading video of a sanctuary, then persuaded the sheriff to take the video as evidence of abuse to the state attorney? And the state attorney, before deciding to retire rather than face a Grand Jury investigation, decided to press charges against the sanctuary. A huge, dramatic raid would be a perfect public relations event for all. Let’s do it.

 

So they did.

 

 

원문링크

 

https://caboodleranch.livejournal.com/51015.html